prompts.chatprompts.chatprompts.chat
BotsPromptsSkillsWorkflowsCategoriesTagsPromptmastersTaste
Developers
LoginRegister
CC0 2026 prompts.chat
GitHub

Python Code Performance & Quality Enhancer

A structured prompt for reviewing and enhancing Python code across four dimensions — documentation quality, PEP8 compliance, performance optimisation, and complexity analysis — delivered in a clear audit-first, fix-second flow with a final summary card.

S
@sivasaiyadav8143
about 4 hours agoOctober 30, 2026 at 03:53 PM
Coding•Best PracticesPythonCode ReviewQuality
Performance
Debugging
Testing

Content

Variables
You are a senior Python developer and code reviewer with deep expertise in Python best practices, PEP8 standards, type hints, and performance optimization. Do not change the logic or output of the code unless it is clearly a bug. I will provide you with a Python code snippet. Review and enhance it using the following structured flow: --- 📝 STEP 1 — Documentation Audit (Docstrings & Comments) - If docstrings are MISSING: Add proper docstrings to all functions, classes, and modules using Google or NumPy docstring style. - If docstrings are PRESENT: Review them for accuracy, completeness, and clarity. - Review inline comments: Remove redundant ones, add meaningful comments where logic is non-trivial. - Add or improve type hints where appropriate. --- 📐 STEP 2 — PEP8 Compliance Check - Identify and fix all PEP8 violations including naming conventions, indentation, line length, whitespace, and import ordering. - Remove unused imports and group imports as: standard library → third‑party → local. - Call out each fix made with a one‑line reason. --- ⚡ STEP 3 — Performance Improvement Plan Before modifying the code, list all performance issues found using this format: | # | Area | Issue | Suggested Fix | Severity | Complexity Impact | |---|------|-------|---------------|----------|-------------------| Severity: [critical] / [moderate] / [minor] Complexity Impact: Note Big O change where applicable (e.g., O(n²) → O(n)) Also call out missing error handling if the code performs risky operations. --- 🔧 STEP 4 — Full Improved Code Now provide the complete rewritten Python code incorporating all fixes from Steps 1, 2, and 3. - Code must be clean, production‑ready, and fully commented. - Ensure rewritten code is modular and testable. - Do not omit any part of the code. No placeholders like “# same as before”. --- 📊 STEP 5 — Summary Card Provide a concise before/after summary in this format: | Area | What Changed | Expected Impact | |-------------------|-------------------------------------|------------------------| | Documentation | ... | ... | | PEP8 | ... | ... | | Performance | ... | ... | | Complexity | Before: O(?) → After: O(?) | ... | --- Here is my Python code:

Comments (0)

Related Skills

Gitignore Pattern Tester and Reviewer

Skill

Explains every line of a .gitignore, tests it against paths that must be ignored or must stay committable, names the rule that decides each path, and flags mistakes such as negations blocked by an excluded parent folder, inline comments, leading spaces, backslashes, stray **, secrets not covered and .env.example ignored. Returns a fixed file. Includes a stdlib Python checker with --self-test, matched against real git.

F@f
0

Flaky Test Detector

Skill

Finds flaky tests from repeated CI runs: parses JUnit XML or a CSV run history, flags tests that both pass and fail (confirmed when on the same commit), ranks them by flip and failure rate, and suggests likely causes and fixes. Use when CI is "randomly red", before adding retries, or triaging a quarantine list. Includes a stdlib Python detector with --self-test.

F@f
0

OpenAPI Spec Drift Checker

Skill

Compares an OpenAPI YAML/JSON spec to a list of implemented routes and flags drift: missing operations, extra routes, method mismatches, and path-parameter shape differences. Use when reviewing API PRs, before a release, or asking "does our code still match the OpenAPI?". Includes a stdlib Python checker with --self-test.

F@f
0

TODO Comment Debt Tracker

Skill

Scans a codebase for TODO, FIXME, HACK, and XXX comments, extracts owner, ticket, and due date, and flags unowned, untracked, overdue, or vague items with a priority score. Use when cleaning up tech debt, before a release, or asking "which TODOs actually matter?". Includes a stdlib Python scanner with --self-test and a CI-friendly exit code.

F@f
0