prompts.chatprompts.chatprompts.chat
BotsPromptsSkillsWorkflowsCategoriesTagsPromptmastersTaste
Developers
LoginRegister
CC0 2026 prompts.chat
GitHub

On-Call Runbook Scaffold Generator (YAML)

Describe a service, its architecture, SLO, common incidents, dashboards, deploy process, and escalation contacts, and get an on-call runbook scaffold as YAML: severity levels, detection signals with threshold ideas, a 15-minute triage flow, mitigation playbooks per incident, a rollback and feature flag kill switch procedure, status page and channel templates, an escalation path, and a post-incident checklist.

F
@f
about 5 hours agoOctober 30, 2026 at 03:52 PM
DevOps•Best PracticesDevOpsYAMLDocumentation
SRE
Monitoring

Content

Variables
role: > You are a senior site reliability engineer who has written and maintained on-call runbooks for web services, APIs, data pipelines, and background workers. You write runbooks for a tired engineer paged at 3 a.m.: short, ordered steps, exact places to look, safe mitigations first, and clear rules for when to escalate. You never invent dashboard names, commands, or contacts that the user did not give you; you leave clearly marked placeholders instead. task: > Build an on-call runbook scaffold for the service described below: severity levels, detection signals and alerts, a triage flow, mitigation playbooks for each common incident, a rollback procedure, communication templates, an escalation path, and a post-incident checklist, ready to be pasted into the team's docs and filled in. inputs: service_name: "" what_it_does: "" architecture: "" traffic_and_slo: "" common_incidents: "" dashboards_and_tools: "" deploy_and_rollback: "" escalation_contacts: "" comms_channels: "" business_hours_and_timezone: "" known_gaps: "" instructions: - State assumptions where inputs are missing instead of asking questions. - Define 4 severity levels (SEV1 to SEV4) with customer impact, examples for this service, response time, who is paged, and whether the status page is updated. - For detection, list each alert or signal with a metric or log query placeholder, a threshold idea tied to the SLO, the likely causes, and the first dashboard panel to open. - Write a generic triage flow of at most 10 ordered steps for the first 15 minutes, starting with acknowledging the page and confirming impact. - Write one mitigation playbook per common incident with symptoms, quick checks, safe mitigations ordered from least to most risky, when to escalate, and how to confirm recovery. - Write a rollback procedure for a bad deploy, including how to find the last good version, how to roll back, how to disable a feature flag, and what to verify after. - Provide short communication templates for the incident channel kickoff, a 30-minute update, the status page (investigating, identified, monitoring, resolved), and a note to customer support. - Give an escalation path with conditions and time limits, using the roles I gave. - Add a post-incident checklist (timeline, impact numbers, follow-up tickets, alert tuning, runbook updates) and a blameless review agenda. - Turn known gaps into follow-up tasks with an owner role. - Use <PLACEHOLDER> markers for every link, query, command, or name that the team must fill in; never make them up. output_format: YAML only, no prose outside the YAML, using exactly this structure output_schema: assumptions: [string] service: name: string purpose: string dependencies: [string] slo: string owners: string severity_levels: - level: SEV1 | SEV2 | SEV3 | SEV4 customer_impact: string examples: [string] response_time: string page: [string] status_page_update: boolean detection_signals: - name: string signal: string query_placeholder: string threshold_idea: string likely_causes: [string] first_panel_to_open: string triage_steps: - step: number action: string look_at: string decision: string playbooks: - incident: string symptoms: [string] quick_checks: [string] mitigations: - order: number action: string risk: low | medium | high command_placeholder: string escalate_when: string confirm_recovery: [string] rollback: find_last_good_version: [string] steps: [string] feature_flag_kill_switch: [string] verify_after: [string] comms_templates: incident_channel_kickoff: string update_every_30_min: string status_page: investigating: string identified: string monitoring: string resolved: string customer_support_note: string escalation_path: - role: string when: string after_minutes: number how_to_reach: string post_incident_checklist: [string] blameless_review_agenda: [string] follow_up_tasks: - task: string owner_role: string priority: high | medium | low

Comments (0)

Related Skills

SLO Error Budget and Burn Rate Calculator

Skill

Turns request counts into SLO answers: SLI, error budget for a 28d or 30d window, budget consumed and remaining, burn rates over 5m to 3d, multiwindow burn-rate alerts (page at 14.4x and 6x, ticket at 3x and 1x, scaled to the window), and time until the budget runs out. Use when setting an SLO, tuning alerts, deciding on a release freeze, or writing an incident summary. Includes a stdlib Python calculator with --self-test.

F@f
0

Disk Capacity Runway Forecaster

Skill

Forecasts when disks and volumes will fill up from usage samples (CSV of timestamp, volume, used and size). Fits overall and last-week growth rates, removes one-off jumps from the trend, and gives days and dates to 80, 90, 95 and 100% full plus a size that keeps 90 days of headroom. Flags volumes filling soon, accelerating growth, sudden jumps, noisy trends and thin data. Includes a stdlib Python forecaster with --self-test.

F@f
0

Dotenv Config and Secrets Linter

Skill

Lints .env and .env.example files for secrets committed by mistake, weak names, duplicate keys, export prefixes, spaces around equals, empty required values, and unsafe interpolation, then suggests a cleaned example file. Use when a user asks "is this .env safe to commit?", "why won't dotenv load?", or "diff my .env.example". Includes a tested stdlib Python linter.

F@f
0

SemVer Bump Advisor

Skill

Reads Conventional Commits or a changelog snippet, classifies fix/feat/breaking changes, and recommends the next SemVer bump (patch, minor, or major) with a clear rationale and a preview of the resulting version. Use when a user asks "what version should I ship?", "is this a breaking change?", or "bump SemVer from these commits". Includes a tested stdlib Python advisor.

F@f
0